"Climate Change" mega hoax

The scientists that are pushing the "climate change" narrative are not to be forgiven. They have been running a long running academic mafia that discredits, defunds and destroys the career of those who go against their Omerta code.

Climate system consists of the following components (disregarding smaller ones).

1. Convection-advection = Not at all predictable in tropics.

2. Radiation = Extremely nonlinear and almost unpredictable.

3. Clouds and rain = unpredictable in tropics.

4. Aerosols = Extremely nonlinear and almost unpredictable.

5. Sea temperatures = people have started understanding this. Nowhere close to understanding fully.

When individual components are not understood well, only charlatans will claim they know the entire global climate system.

Not only the above, each component of the climate system is nonlinear and not only this, each component interacts with the other. 

E.g. Increased clouds in air = lesser radiation on ground = lesser convection advection. This is a simple commonsensical fact. But for computational systems this means the death knell. This was discovered by a scientist called Lorenz and is popularly called  the "butterfly effect".

https://vimeo.com/311525207

I.e. doesn't matter how powerful your computer, how big a floating point you use in computation, the smallest floating point truncation error may lead to an error signal to propagate through the time steps so as to make the whole computational exercise futile. And this also affords an opportunity for anyone with big enough pockets to fund narratives!! This is at the root of "Climate change" hoax.

"The sky will fall on your head if you don't cut down on greenhouse gases and buy snake oil technologies that save the environment".

The only condition for prediction of coupled nonlinear systems *as of now* is 

1. Infinite computational power.

2. Infinite floating point.

3. Infinitely resolved ground data of all the predictor parameters.

Anything lesser than this can work at very small time scales, i.e. a few days. That too not globally. 

Given this, you may ask, what are the "climate change scientists" working on?

Well, they are given cherry picked scenarios by globalist snake oil sellers. They will test hypotheses such as - What will happen if global "green house" emissions become double?

They compute these scenarios with a clear intent to push narratives. They also have hundreds if not thousands of parameters that they can tweak in the equations to arrive at the "desired" result. You may think of this as a cynical view. But it is the bare truth. "Climate change" is a weapon being used by globalists to contain the growth of poorer nations. They started with the "global warming" narrative and had to change terminology because the globe didn't warm up to their expectations (metaphorically and literally).

Not only this, the "scientists" also have the sword of Damocles hanging over their heads and anyone disagreeing with the "consensus" is defunded, discredited and his career destroyed.

Moreover, if anyone is a "climate change skeptic", he is not even given access to the computational facilities that are in place to test hypotheses about climate systems. This is the most important issue. Viz. Denial of access to computational facilities for those who don't hold the "mainstream" view. How on earth can alternative analyses of climate systems emerge?

No one can think of controverting the narrative of climate scientists now because of the costs involved. The developing countries should have worked towards developing scientific human resource and infrastructure to fight this narrative. But the leaders of these countries seem to be in thrall of this narrative. After all it is being pushed with the "best intentions".

Anyone who tells that he has a perfect computational model of the global climate is a charlatan. But the highest criminals are those who dictate policy to developing countries based on doomsday scenarios cooked up by knaves. No climate scientist will ever face judicial scrutiny because the plausible deniability in this field is extremely high.