The scientists that are pushing the "climate change" narrative are not to be forgiven. They have been running a long running academic mafia that discredits, defunds and destroys the career of those who go against their Omerta code. Climate system consists of the following components (disregarding smaller ones). 1. Convection-advection = Not at all predictable in tropics. 2. Radiation = Extremely nonlinear and almost unpredictable. 3. Clouds and rain = unpredictable in tropics. 4. Aerosols = Extremely nonlinear and almost unpredictable. 5. Sea temperatures = people have started understanding this. Nowhere close to understanding fully. When individual components are not understood well, only charlatans will claim they know the entire global climate system. Not only the above, each component of the climate system is nonlinear and not only this, each component interacts with the other. E.g. Increased clouds in air = lesser radiation on ground = lesser convection advection. This ...
There is a not-so-innocent story doing the rounds in social media. It is not-so-innocent because it seems to be driven by an agenda to delink a Samskṛta pada from its roots and attribute to it Telugu roots with also an intention to attribute longer history to Telugu than what is accepted today. Reproduced below is the story with an analysis following it. Do you know the secret behind as to why Tirupati Balaji is called ‘GOVINDA’? There is a wonderful and very interesting story .... SWAMY…..GOVU ….INDA ………….!!!!! A lovely incident happened when Lord Vishnu came to Bhuloka in search of Mahalaxmi …..when he entered Bhuloka as usual, he got human qualities like thirst and hunger, this following incident is conversation between Lord Srinivasa and Sage Agastya Muni..… Lord Srinivasa once went to the hermitage of Sage Agastya and said "Munindra, I have come to Bhu Loka (Earth) on a particular mission and going to stay here till the end of the Kali Yuga.... I'm very fond o...
This response is Authored by Ganesh Krishnamoorthy with editorial inputs of Mr. Shrivathsa B(from hereon, SB) in continuation of the Part 1 of the response of SB to Shatavadhani R Ganesh’s (from hereon, SG or RG) article . It is now our revised and considered view that RG's article could have been titled aptly to suit the main theme of their article . N amely : “Why it is ok for Hindus to eat beef and drink intoxicants? Weren’t their ancestors doing the same?” The following is a detailed para by para analysis and rebuttal (where necessary) of RG's article. The first paragraph of SG’s article refers to a survey of meat eating in India. W e are not sure how the authors are safely deducing that the decline in meat eating in India is “not due to Hinduism” when the same survey they referred to clearly indicates that roughly only 20% of the population in India amounts to Non-Hindus. This being the statis...
Comments